Files
libphonenumber/resources/metadata/380/comments.csv
Vlasislav Kashin 5f8bdd4b39 add resources
2025-06-27 10:56:08 +03:00

1.6 KiB

1Region Label Comment
2UA SC http://www.itu.int/oth/T02020000DB/en
3UA SC http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%2B380
4UA XML http://www.itu.int/oth/T02020000DB/en
5UA XML http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%2B380
6UA XML No definitive list has been found of what constitutes the area code for formatting.\nhttp://www.ua.all-biz.info/guide/phonecodes is useful but not error-free.\nHave used local yellow pages guidelines, Google searches, regression tests\nand bugs to reverse-engineer the formatting rules.
7UA XML_FIXED_LINE Official numbering plan https://regulation.gov.ua/documents/id89506 (Dated: 23.11.2006)\nmentions that xx[018] (xx represents valid area code) fixed-line numbers as invalid and\nwe are also unable to find valid numbers online. This doc is already outdated and\ncontradicted (Eg: length of NSN) by some more recent evidence. Considering the impact\nwe choose not to mark those ranges as invalid.
8UA XML_MOBILE Added 71 prefix based on user report and 72 based on online numbers.
9UA XML_PREMIUM_RATE 4th digit added based on\nhttp://www.mts.ua/ru/support/services/200-tarify-na-nomera-0-800-0-900-0-703/
10UA XML_VOIP 89[1-579] ranges are mentioned as "Non-geographic number – mobile services assigned" in\nthe ITU doc. All the 89X phone numbers found online are listed as conference calls and\nskype calls which are actually VOIP. And also the companies to which these ranges are\nassigned (as per ITU doc) are more of VOIP service providers. So supporting them under\nVOIP.